The POCITS Foundation holds stewardship over the largest share of the ecosystem's token distribution — deploying enterprise and humanitarian grants on behalf of every county that joins the network. The community governs itself. The Foundation ensures it has the resources to do so.
Identity
Three distinct roles. One governing body.
Constitutional Architecture
Three independent signatories. All three required on every significant decision. Mathematical architecture encoded in smart contracts — not a gentlemen's agreement. No single actor reaches a majority without at least one other signatory.
Constitutional Principle
Every system, partnership, and programme the POCITS Foundation deploys must answer two questions.
0.00001 POCIT = 1 pete/pocitcoin = 1 marc = 8.64 secondsThe Development Fund
Unlike government grant programmes or VC funds, PGET grants are designed for repayment. PGET grants are funded by the community's own POCIT asset pool — tau. The county reserve provides liquidity. These are distinct functions. Economic activity funded by grants generates advertising revenue which flows back through the 80/20 split — replenishing the fund, not depleting it.
Financial Architecture
The POCITS Foundation operates a completely separate financial architecture from the county reserve network. These pools do not commingle — each has distinct governance, custody, and mandate.
| Allocation | % | Volume | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| County Enterprise Fund (CEF) | 80% | 8B POCIT | Community development grants, deployed per county by population formula |
| County Reserves | 10% | 1B POCIT | Day-one advertising inventory per county, replenished through operations |
| POCITS Foundation / PGET | 8% | 800M POCIT | Development engine, system grants, PGST partnerships, natural resources pilots |
| PGTF | 1% | 100M POCIT | Pocits Global Trust Fund |
| Pocits Inc. | 1% | 100M POCIT | Corporate associate allocation |
Total supply: 10 billion POCIT. Established value: $20 USD per POCIT.
Pocits Inc. serves as Corporate Director of development and operations, receiving an annual service fee of 100,000 POCIT ($2M USD). It rendered the network as a public utility by severing from corporate ownership via trade sale for 1% of token supply. Pocits Inc. holds no share of advertising revenue and has no equity stake in network ownership.
| Pool | Function |
|---|---|
| PGET Pool | Primary development fund — 800M POCIT, appreciating asset base |
| PPTF Bridge Capital | Market maker function — maintains token floor during early-stage ad market development; exits as the market matures |
| PGTF | Pocits Global Trust Fund (1% allocation, separate mandate) |
| BitShares DEX | Settlement infrastructure for token trading; public exchange market under XCHG development |
| Partner Liquidity | Development partners provide the cash side of liquidity pools for each division; the Foundation provides the POCIT side |
State and country-level Place profiles generate their own advertising revenue (80/20 split) under separate mandates — not distributed to specific counties. These mandates are administered by the Foundation and its delegate structures.
Development Portfolio
Each department is a PGET-funded sub-project of the POCITS Foundation, maintaining a public project profile — the same transparency standard applied to every grant recipient. The Foundation is its own proof of concept.
Governance Layer
Every county that joins the Foundation appoints three signatories — not a committee, not a board. Three people, each accountable to one function: the money, the grants, and the exchange. Together they are the Foundation's presence in your county.
International Layer
At the international scale, the POCITS Foundation operates as Pocits Global Advertising — the network layer above the county ecosystem, where global advertisers buy circulation time, not impressions, paying into reserves rather than extracting from them.
Even at the international level, the same two questions apply. Where does the money go? Down the hierarchy to communities. Who owns what gets monetized? Democratic governance at each level.
No level of the hierarchy extracts upward to distant shareholders. The architecture makes extraction structurally impossible, not merely contractually prohibited. The mathematical 2% capture limit applies at every layer.
Participation